Bisl A framework for business information management

Updates
1

Can you investigate whether chain and Onyxcoin can set up a form of a Bisl structure . A framework for business information management

2

Technically, yes, OnyxDAO could adapt BiSL principles, but it’s not a natural fit due to its decentralized, blockchain-driven nature

3

Here are some approaches that Onyx could consider:

Hybrid Governance Framework

  1. Layered Governance Structure

    • Strategically divide responsibilities between the corporate team and the DAO
    • Executive team (CEO, CTO) focuses on operational efficiency and business processes
    • DAO voting concentrates on strategic decisions and protocol modifications

  2. Customized BiSL Model

    • Develop a “Decentralized BiSL” framework specifically designed for DAOs
    • Retain the core principles of information management but adapt the implementation
    • Replace hierarchical control mechanisms with decentralized verification

  3. Guild-based Workflows

    • Organize workflows into semi-autonomous “guilds” with specific areas of expertise
    • Each guild can follow internal BiSL principles for their information management
    • Coordination between guilds happens via DAO governance

Technological Solutions

  1. On-chain Management Tools

    • Develop specific tools that implement BiSL principles but operate on a blockchain
    • Create transparent dashboards for metric tracking and performance measurement
    • Integrate with voting processes for real-time feedback and adjustments

  2. Smart Contract Automation

    • Encode certain BiSL processes in smart contracts to ensure consistency
    • Automate routine information management processes while retaining human input for more complex decisions
    • Use multi-sig mechanisms for shared responsibility

Cultural and Process Changes

  1. Community Working Groups

    • Create specific working groups focused on implementing information management standards
    • Give them autonomy within frameworks approved by the broader DAO
    • Regular reporting and transparency to the entire community

  2. Distributed but Standardized Processes

    • Define standard processes for information management that everyone can follow
    • Utilize template libraries and best practices approved by the DAO
    • Maintain flexibility in implementation but consistency in documentation

By combining these approaches, Onyx can enjoy the benefits of structured information management without abandoning the fundamental principles of decentralized governance. The key is to find a balance between standardization for efficiency and decentralization for autonomy and innovation.

4

i dont think a dao can have CEO

5

what is the benfit of this Bisl framework

6

Comprehensive Analysis: BiSL Implementation for Chain and Onyxcoin

Strategic Level

1. Information Strategy & Governance

Current situation:

  • Hybrid structure where traditional corporate leadership (CEO, CTO) exists alongside DAO governance
  • Unclear boundaries between centralized and decentralized governance
  • Potential information asymmetry between core team and community

BiSL improvements:

  • Formal definition of information domains: which decisions are centralized vs. decentralized
  • Structured framework for strategic information provision
  • Clear criteria for when decisions must go through OIPs vs. core team discretion

Concrete benefits:

  • Reduction in governance conflicts
  • Clearer lines of accountability
  • Better balance between efficiency and decentralization

2. Information Portfolio Management

Current situation:

  • Multiple products and initiatives (XCN Ledger, Goliath, sXCN)
  • Possible lack of coordinated information strategy
  • Risk of overlapping or conflicting information systems

BiSL improvements:

  • Structured portfolio management for all information-related assets
  • Formal evaluation methods for new information projects
  • Rationalization of existing information systems and processes

Concrete benefits:

  • Better resource allocation between projects
  • Reduced redundancy in systems
  • Strategic alignment of investments

Tactical Level

1. Information Need Management

Current situation:

  • Diverse stakeholders with varying information needs (investors, developers, partners)
  • Ad-hoc response to emerging information questions
  • Potentially reactive rather than proactive information provision

BiSL improvements:

  • Systematic analysis of information needs per stakeholder group
  • Regular evaluation and prioritization of information requirements
  • Structured translation of needs into concrete information products

Concrete benefits:

  • Better alignment between information supply and demand
  • Proactive identification of information gaps
  • More efficient allocation of information resources

2. Contract Management & Supplier Management

Current situation:

  • Partnerships with various external parties (e.g., Conduit for rollup deployment)
  • Integrations with external services (Privy, Thirdweb, Decent)
  • Potentially informal arrangements around information exchange

BiSL improvements:

  • Formal information SLAs with partners and suppliers
  • Structured evaluation of information exchange
  • Clear responsibilities for interface management

Concrete benefits:

  • Improved reliability of external information services
  • Clearer agreements on data ownership and usage
  • Better monitoring mechanisms for supplier performance

3. Planning & Control

Current situation:

  • Roadmap with various initiatives (Goliath, sXCN, wallet)
  • Possible challenges in planning due to hybrid governance
  • Risk of shifting priorities without formal control

BiSL improvements:

  • Structured planning and control cycle for information management
  • Formal connection between strategic goals and operational activities
  • Regular performance evaluation against defined information objectives

Concrete benefits:

  • Improved predictability of projects
  • Early detection and mitigation of deviations
  • Better resource allocation over time

Operational Level

1. Business Data Management

Current situation:

  • Various data sources (on-chain data, user statistics, community feedback)
  • Potentially inconsistent data standards
  • Challenges in effectively combining data from different sources

BiSL improvements:

  • Standardized definition of core data
  • Formal data governance processes
  • Clear ownership and responsibility for data quality

Concrete benefits:

  • Improved data quality and consistency
  • More reliable data-driven decision making
  • More efficient data integration between systems

2. User Support

Current situation:

  • Support via various channels (Telegram, forum, Discord)
  • Ambassador program as first line of support
  • Potentially inconsistent information across different channels

BiSL improvements:

  • Structured knowledge management for support
  • Formal escalation processes for complex questions
  • Proactive information provision based on user analysis

Concrete benefits:

  • More consistent user experience
  • Faster response times
  • More efficient knowledge sharing within support team

3. Operational Chain Management

Current situation:

  • Complex chain of information systems (Ethereum, Base, Onyx Layer 3, Goliath)
  • Challenges in end-to-end monitoring
  • Potential gaps in information flow between systems

BiSL improvements:

  • Comprehensive end-to-end process mapping
  • Clear definition of system interfaces and dependencies
  • Structured monitoring of information flows across the chain

Concrete benefits:

  • Improved system reliability
  • Faster issue identification and resolution
  • Better coordination between different system components

Implementation Strategy

1. Phased Approach

Initial phase:

  • Assessment of current information management capabilities
  • Identification of critical information processes
  • Definition of BiSL implementation roadmap

Intermediate phase:

  • Implementation of core BiSL processes
  • Training of key personnel
  • Establishment of governance structures

Advanced phase:

  • Full integration of BiSL across all information domains
  • Continuous improvement mechanisms
  • Maturity assessment and benchmarking

2. Balancing Decentralization with Structure

Challenges:

  • Maintaining decentralized ethos while implementing structured framework
  • Avoiding bureaucratic overhead that could hamper innovation
  • Ensuring community buy-in for formal processes

Solutions:

  • Transparent communication about BiSL benefits
  • Community involvement in BiSL implementation decisions
  • Adapting BiSL to fit blockchain-specific requirements

3. Measuring Success

Key Performance Indicators:

  • Information quality improvement metrics
  • Process efficiency gains
  • User satisfaction with information provision
  • Reduction in information-related incidents
  • Improved decision-making timelines

This comprehensive BiSL implementation would significantly enhance Chain and Onyxcoin’s ability to manage information effectively across their hybrid organizational structure, bridging the gap between traditional corporate management and decentralized governance while ensuring consistent, high-quality information throughout the ecosystem.

7

In AMA they said no info on this